Talk:Bilateral treaty

International relations: Law Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Top-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bilateral treaty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515005722/http://www.icj-cij.org/ to http://www.icj-cij.org/.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge candidate

I'm not going to flag this page for merge just now.

That said, unless this page develops some content specific to advantages/disadvantages of bilateral treaties (as opposed to multilateral treaties) it's doomed in the long run.

We do treat bilateral romance (aka marriage) separately from multilateral romance (tabloid fodder), so there can be strong reasons to distinguish the bilateral from the multilateral, but holy hell you have to name some of these if you want the page to move our of your basement and establish independent life. — MaxEnt 16:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]