Talk:Bikini bridge

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bikini bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113145920/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2535098/Is-bikini-bridge-new-thigh-gap-Disturbing-new-selfie-fad-circulating-social-media.html to http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2535098/Is-bikini-bridge-new-thigh-gap-Disturbing-new-selfie-fad-circulating-social-media.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus article. Should be corrected and expanded dramatically if possible, or deleted. 4chan did not invent human anatomy, nor are they a fashion leader.

Bikini bridges, as "a thing", have been around for far more than 2 decades. While everything mentioned in this article may have happened, it didn't start there, it wasn't a hoax. It's just something that happens depending on clothing choice and hip bone placement. It may have been pumped up by 4chan, but it certainly wasn't invented by them, nor is it a hoax.

Additionally, point of fact, as an actual anatomical feature that exists, how could it be labelled "a hoax" at all?

Article should be nominated for deletion. Maelefique^(talk) 17:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have reliable secondary sources that support this opinion? ViperSnake151 Talk 22:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliably secondary sources to support the fact that human beings have had hip bones prior to 2014? jp×g 03:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]