Talk:Bikeway controversies

Safety & Speed

The opposition as bikeways may not be conducive to a broad spectrum of forms of riding & types of riders also factors as an argument against aspects of 'Complete Streets'. Even though the concept is to make the roads safe for everyone, it does so by aiming for the slowest possible speed & by making the roads less safe in order to gain compliance to that. The goal is laudable, accessibility, yet, the means is horrible & perverse, pleasantness through unpleasantness. Very Orwellian. It is also very dangerous. For example, using Stop signs where they should not be used causes Stop signs to be less effective, which is a danger to the public. So, it has the exact opposite effect that is desires. Nantucketnoon (talk) 02:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're mixing up the general concept of Complete Streets and Shared space, but even then it's a very opinionated idea of Shared Space that wouldn't fit into Wikipedia and are definitely not a part of this article on bikeway controversies. You could do some research and edit the Shared Space article. Nubeli (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bikeway controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]