Talk:Bignose shark

Bignose shark has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 16, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Sharks Low‑importance

	Sharks portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bignose shark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I realise I review a lot of your articles- I've stayed away from this one for a little while, but no one else grabbed it. I'll stay away in the future if you'd rather have a wider influence! J Milburn (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"of requiem shark, family Carcharhinidae" Is this not redundant? Carcharhinidae redirects to requiem shark

Removed the redundant link, though I like having both terms in the prose.

"group consisted of large," Why past tense?

Changed

A link to Species description would be useful

Added

The distribution specifies that it is found from the Mediterranean to Ghana, but the map misses out a lot of that range

Changed statement in distribution

batfish is a dablink

Fixed

"Birthing occurs in August and September in the Mediterranean, and in September and October off Madagascar." This just leaves open the question of when it happens elsewhere- perhaps something like "Birthing has been seen to occur in August and September in the Mediterranean, and in September and October off Madagascar.

Changed to "Birthing has been reported to occur in..."

Presumably we don't know how long individual sharks live?

I haven't seen such data

"The bignose shark is not utilized commercially in Australia or the United States, where it is listed as Prohibited Species under the 2007 Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Atlantic tunas, swordfish and sharks." Implies it is listed as such in both countries

Switched the order of the two countries

"The species is considered to be of concern however, given that it is slow-reproducing and faces widespread heavy fishing pressure; there is evidence that its numbers have recently declined in the Maldives." Rather long, awkward sentence

Split to two sentences

"it is suspected to have declined there because it is commonly misidentified as the sandbar shark, which has been severely depleted by US longline fishing." I don't follow

Expanded sentence to clarify

File:Squalus mitsukurii.jpg is a little confusing- at first I thought they were feeding bignose sharks. Perhaps consider leading with the diagram, and using the image of the shark from behind to illustrate its deep-water habitats? Also, the map could do with a link to the image on which it was based.

Link added. Amended image caption to clarify what's being shown. I personally prefer using a photo in the taxobox since I think you can't beat a photo to give somebody an impression of what an animal's actually like

Category:Edible fish? Category:Fish of the Mediterranean Sea, Category:Fish of the Atlantic Ocean, Category:Fish of the Indian Ocean, Category:Fish of the Pacific Ocean?

I'll add all but the first one, which I don't find pointful since there must be thousands upon thousands of fish that are potentially edible.

As usual, the sources are appropriate, referencing appears unproblematic. There are no problems with stability or NPOV. I'm sure I'll be happy to promote once the small issues above are dealt with. J Milburn (talk) 15:34, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know of further issues. I don't much care about influence, just that the review is good (as yours are). -- Yzx (talk) 18:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Your replies are reasonable, and another look through the article reveals no further issues that I can't fix myself. I'm promoting now; good work, as usual. J Milburn (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bignose shark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627094911/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bignose shark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120326100855/http://cis.arl.arizona.edu/PERT/people/Daly-Engel/Daly-Engel_2006.pdf to http://cis.arl.arizona.edu/PERT/people/Daly-Engel/Daly-Engel_2006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]