Talk:Bigbang (Norwegian band)

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opening heading

I suggest that this image is removed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bigbanggoestofrance.jpg . It's really ugly, and the text on top of it does not help very much. Mikapell 00:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested moved

A requested move involving this article is currently taking place, and the discussion can be found here. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 04:33, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big Bang (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 04:45, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus in this discussion was to move (i.e. remove spacing). CamelCase not implemented as discussed below, keep disambiguation as similar to spaced version and unspaced version redirects to main subject. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bang (Norwegian band) → Bigbang (Norwegian band) — While many versions exist, the most common is BigBang, which is the one found in norwegian paper dictionaries, however simply Bigbang will suffice as a non-complicated article header, with the current Big Bang being the least used name. MURGH ^talk 10:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Probably best to let this one run its course, as band names tend to lead to all sorts of discussion, but it seems to me to be just tidying up after successfully concluded discussions on other similar band names. Bigbang is preferred to BigBang IMO unless a strong case can be made that the camelcase version is dominant in English usage. Andrewa (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I too think that's fine for the namespace, although heavy sources support its use in the article. MURGH ^talk 16:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Support, but wouldn't simply "Bigbang" suffice (looking at Big Bang (disambiguation), there don't seem to be any other uses for that word)?--Kotniski (talk) 13:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bigbang (Norwegian band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304033713/http://www.norwegiancharts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Bigbang to http://norwegiancharts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Bigbang

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bigbang (Norwegian band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bigbang (Norwegian band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130112082345/http://fil.nrk.no/musikk/gml_musikkleksikon/1.6113024 to http://fil.nrk.no/musikk/gml_musikkleksikon/1.6113024

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. It was pointed out that the usage is not as consistent in sources as it appeared from what was said in the opening paragraph of the article. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bigbang (Norwegian band) → BigBang (Norwegian band) – According to the opening paragraph of the article (which cites eight sources for the statement), the name of this band is usually styled as "BigBang". That is the same name styling we now use for the name of another band, BigBang (South Korean band). If the name of this band is usually styled that way in sources, and if we use that styling for the other band on Wikipedia, then we should style this one the same way to be consistent. CapitalizedWords / Pascal case is a relatively common styling for the names of entities. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. 2pou (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Is it usually styled "BigBang" in sources? No evidence either way has been presented. However, their own website, Spotify page, YouTube video releases, etc., consistently use "Bigbang" from what I'm seeing [1]. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't exactly "no evidence" – I said there were eight sources cited in the corresponding sentence in the article's opening paragraph to support the proposal. The website of the record label (http://www.petroleumrecords.no/) shows all-caps, so no help there, but it links to a Facebook page for the band. The Facebook page uses BigBang. I just checked the eight sources that were cited to support the statement in the opening paragraph. One of them actually (at least currently) uses Bigbang and two are dead links. The other five use BigBang as described. The band's own website (https://bigbang.no/) doesn't seem to have the band's name in text anwhere except in the footer, which says "© 2023 BigBang Nettsted av User Centrix Ltd.". The cover art of the one album shown on the band's website uses Bigbang. The cover art shown on Spotify seems pretty mixed between BIGBANG and Bigbang, along with one bigbang. Spotify and YouTube are not independent sources – they just publish what they are given by the the band itself or the music label, so I don't think they should count for much. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, WP does not add a capital letter except where sources do so consistently, and sources (even the band and its label themselves) are not consistent about it in this case. So, this also triggers MOS:TM: we do not immitate stylization that appears in various forms of marketing; we only do something unusual stylistically (like camelcase) if it strongly dominates in RS coverage of the subject. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Norway, WikiProject Rock music, & WikiProject Alternative music have been notified of this discussion. 2pou (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.