Talk:Big Three (management consultancies)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Proposed Merger

This article is rather short and it seems to me like it could fit in well under the Big Three subsection of the management consulting page. Any thoughts on merging the two? Pereneph (talk) 06:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

This entry should be deleted, it is bogus.

This reads like it's written by someone from Bain. In the final section, "key differences", 2 of the firms have negative or neutral-with-negative-subtext comments, and Bain has a positive one. The article would be more effective if it was written from a more neutral point of view, so that anybody from the firms or those outside them would regard it as clearly balanced. E.g. include something positive and negative about each. I don't think this is a case of where any of these firms is generally regarded as wholly inferior or superior to any of the others, so this shouldn't be hard.

this is obsolete term referring to 90x. In 2013 Completes Acquisition of Monitor’s Global Strategy Consulting Business. Deloitte revenue in 2014 is US$34.2 billion. So, this is the largest consulting company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.26.89 (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Big Three (management consultancies). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]