Talk:Big Pineapple

	Australia portal Big Pineapple is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Visual arts: Public art Start‑class

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Oceania's "10,000 Challenge", which started in November 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Boat Ride

I recalled that this place (when I visited in the late 1980s) had a short indoor boat ride. It consisted of an oval track in which Pirates of the Caribbean style boats moved through depictions of the history of agriculture. It has a section of nighttime swamp around the first bend and an archway with hanging plants that stood in for the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and ended with modern or futuristic agriculture techniques. I've found reviews on travel review sites that mention this ride too.

Shouldn't it be added to the list of attractions at Sunshine Plantation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.152.139 (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rival Big Pineapple in Gympie

I've heard that the actual pineapple at Nambour was replaced at some point, and the original one was sold, ending up at Gympie, hence the "rival" Big Pineapple is not quite a rival after all. Unfortunately, i can't find any solid reference for this, only net speculation.Johnmc (talk) 09:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I grew up in Brisbane and that is certainly what I believed happened. But finding a reference is the problem. Kerry (talk) 22:13, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POV?

Some of the language in this article is quite positive about this business, suggesting a bit of bias. As this is an encyclopaedia, may I suggest this should be fixed? Walkingmelways (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Pineapple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081119234912/http://www.finda.com.au/story/2008/08/27/gympies-big-pineapple-crush/ to http://www.finda.com.au/story/2008/08/27/gympies-big-pineapple-crush/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]