Jump to content

Talk:Big Man on Hippocampus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBig Man on Hippocampus has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 18, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Plot

[edit]

I don't think the Plot section requires expansion since this episode didn't have a sub-plot. Pancake (talk) 19:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Big Man on Hippocampus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Now, most of the article seems GA worthy. However I see a few problems.

First, there is no references on the last paragraph in the "Production" section.
Done. Gage (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I believe that the article should be copyedited because I see too many additive terms. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have requested that the article be copyedited by the Guild of Copy Editors. If you could place the nomination on hold until it has been copyedited, I'd really appreciate it. Gage (talk) 20:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
O.K, I put the article on hold. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit done. NielsenGW (talk) 18:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I saw that the "Production" section is now called "Production and Cast". I also saw that the first paragraph has no references. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Anything else? NielsenGW (talk) 23:11, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Um... no. I see no more problems to this article. I will promote it to GA status. Congrats. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.148.231.235 (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Man on Hippocampus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Man on Hippocampus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Man on Hippocampus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]