Talk:Big Four accounting firms

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Big Four accounting firms article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Business: Accounting High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

General

Please sign all posts with ~~~~ 4 tildes!
Please use this page to discuss any major edits to the article before making them live.

Merger History

Split from #Listing of global members of each of the Big Four.

The "Branding list" that shows the history of mergers should be kept though. Perhaps something like Template:Ahnentafel or Template:Tree_chart will help to make it more readable. CDB-Man (talk) 21:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drafted the merger charts. CDB-Man (talk) 01:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Andersen

Arthur Andersen (1913-2002)

Deloitte

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (1989)
(Deloitte & Touche until 1993)

Deloitte Haskins
& Sells (1978)

Touche Ross (1975)

Deloitte & Co
(UK) (1845)

Haskins & Sells
(US) (1895)

Touche Ross (1960)
(Touche, Ross, Bailey
& Smart until 1969)

Tohmatsu & Co
(Japan) (1968)

Ross (Canada)

George A. Touche (UK)

Touche, Niven, Bailey
& Smart (US) (1947)

Touche Niven (1900)

Bailey & Smart (1947)

EY

Ernst & Young (EY) (1989)
(Ernst & Young until 2013)

Arthur Young (1985)

Ernst & Whinney (EY) (1979)

Arthur Young, McLelland,
Moores & Co (1968)

Arthur Young Broads
Paterson & Co (1923)

Stuart & Young (1894)

Ernst & Ernst
(US) (1903)

Whinney, Smith &
Whinney (UK) (1849)

KPMG

KPMG (1987)
(KPMG Peat Marwick
before 1995)

Peat Marwick (1925) (originally
Peat Marwick Mitchell)

KMG (1979) (officially
Klynveld Main Goerdeler)

Armitage & Norton (1869–1987)

William Barclay
Peat (UK) (1870)

Marwick Mitchell
(US) (1897)

Edwin Gurthie
(1875–1955)

Beevers & Adgie
(1849–1967)

Klynveld Kraayenhof
(Netherlands) (1917)

McLintock Main Lafrentz (1964)

Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
(Germany) (1890)

Thomson McLintock (UK) (1877)

Main Lafrentz (US) (c.1880)

Martin Farlow
(1882–1968)

Grace Ryland
(1967–1969)

Grace, Darbyshire,
& Todd (1818)

CJ Ryland (1910)

PwC

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) (1998)
(PricewaterhouseCoopers until 2010)

Coopers & Lybrand (1973)

Price Waterhouse (US) (1849)

Cooper Brothers (UK) (1854)

Lybrand, Ross Bros, Montgomery (US) (1898)

Implemented. Archiving the old list. CDB-Man (talk) 02:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Branding list

Showing year of formation through merger, or adoption of single brand name.

Arthur Andersen (1913–2002)
Ernst & Young (EY) (1989) (Ernst & Young until 2013)
- Arthur Young (1985)
  - Arthur Young, McLelland, Moores & Co (1968)
  - Arthur Young Broads Paterson & Co (1923)
  - Stuart & Young (1894)
- Ernst & Whinney (EY) (1979)
  - Ernst & Ernst (US) (1903)
  - Whinney, Smith & Whinney (UK) (1849)
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) (1998) (PricewaterhouseCoopers until 2010)
- Coopers & Lybrand (1973)
  - Cooper Brothers (UK) (1854)
  - Lybrand, Ross Bros, Montgomery (US) (1898)
- Price Waterhouse (US) (1849)
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (1989) (Deloitte & Touche until 1993)
- Deloitte Haskins & Sells (1978)
  - Deloitte & Co (UK) (1845)
  - Haskins & Sells (US) (1895)
- Touche Ross (1975)
  - Touche Ross (1960) (Touche, Ross, Bailey & Smart until 1969)
    - Ross (Canada)
    - George A. Touche (UK)
    - Touche, Niven, Bailey & Smart (US) (1947)
      - Touche Niven (1900)
      - Bailey & Smart (1947)
  - Tohmatsu & Co (Japan) (1968)
KPMG (1987) (KPMG Peat Marwick before 1995)
- Peat Marwick (1925) (originally Peat Marwick Mitchell)
  - William Barclay Peat (UK) (1870)
  - Marwick Mitchell (US) (1897)
  - Edwin Gurthie (1875–1955)
  - Beevers & Adgie (1849–1967)
- KMG (1979) (officially Klynveld Main Goerdeler)
  - Klynveld Kraayenhof (Netherlands) (1917)
  - McLintock Main Lafrentz (1964)
    - Thomson McLintock (UK) (1877)
      - Martin Farlow (1882–1968)
      - Grace Ryland (1967–1969)
        Grace, Darbyshire, & Todd (1818)
        
        CJ Ryland (1910)
    - Main Lafrentz (US) (c.1880)
  - Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft (Germany) (1890)
- Armitage & Norton (1869–1987)

Wow that was great work CDB-Man!You are obviously technically talented! WikiCpa (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks WikiCpa; it wasn't that hard to figure out {{Tree chart}}... just took a lot of trial and error to get good alignment.CDB-Man (talk) 13:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added new section under Criticism - Audit Quality and Ethics

Some of the content was under Collusion which actually related to audit quality. I dont think the poor audit quality and ethical issues related to these firms was necessarily "colluding". They were simply getting away with poor quality audit work which is what they were hired to do in the first place to protect the interests of Investors and other stakeholders. Given the number of fines and regulatory actions against all of them including settlements I believe it is more appropriate to deal with these in a separate section.

The edits are still work in progress but please feel free to comment here or on my talk page. Would welcome other editors to add and expand and also clean up the article a bit - it is a bit verbose and disconnected at places and there are good suggestions above by other editors that have not yet been implemented.WikiCpa (talk) 08:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I should mention that I did go and clean up the section a bit, and also added examples of poor audit quality / ethics from all 4 firms, so that the article does not seem biased against any one firm (e.g. there is a lot of recency bias on KPMG with Carillion, and on EY with Wirecard). CDB-Man (talk) 23:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]