Talk:Big Brother 9 (American season)/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions about Big Brother 9 (American season). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Sharon's Cell in the Voting History
Looking kind of bloated... any way we could ameliorate this problem? T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 19:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I fooled around with it in the sandbox, as soon as we put "Nominated" in that column, it'll stretch itself out. T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 20:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
House Calls
I don't watch the show, but I had heard that Evel Dick was a Co-Host of House Calls with Gretchen Massey? If he is, I think that the template at the bottom of the article should be updated accordingly. - zachinthebox (Talk) 21:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- He one of four regular co-hosts this season. Danielle hosts Mondays, Kaysar - Tuesdays, Evel Dick - Wednesdays/Thursdays, Bunky - Fridays. Since her co-host change each season we don't include them. If we include ED we have to include everyone else I mentioned. Bunky & Kaysar are the only two co-hosts to host for two seasons. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Slump?
Is there a way too mention that this season has slumped in terms of ratings? Viewers have also had alot of negative things to say as well. 70.52.135.42 (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think the US/UK ratings table says it all. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
What about a mention of how it was the youngest and least diverse season yet? 70.52.135.42 (talk) 23:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Voting History -- Suggested changes
Here are some versions of the Voting History table that have been used recently. Which one should we use, the default, the slim one, the new one?
See my sandbox for the three options and how they look.
♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Voting History Changes
I have noticed a certain user, who keeps changing the table. We have never done it with the couples on one line, I think everyone would agree. It looks WAY too messy. Why can't we just keep it how it has been since 2008? --RachelRice (talk) 20:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oh my mistake, I didn't realise they were nominating two separate people. --MSalmon (talk) 22:03, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- They are voting two separate people really. --RachelRice (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I suggest you stop being ignorant, and stop vandalizing the table. Anyone should be allowed to contribute. Everyone agreed beforehand to have the table how it was for FOUR YEARS. Why change now? And why ask me to discuss it when you are just going to be ignorant? --RachelRice (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- They are voting two separate people really. --RachelRice (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Changes
@24.224.181.78: Please discuss the changes you wish to make here. Chase (talk) 19:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)