Talk:Big Brother (Australian TV series) season 3

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Big Brother High‑importance

	Television portal The Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and Big Brother (Australian TV series) season 3 has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.Big BrotherWikipedia:WikiProject Big BrotherTemplate:WikiProject Big BrotherBig Brother articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Big Brother (Australian TV series) season 3 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

This page is inconsistent with the latest style of the series Big Brother Australia series 6, and needs to be brought up to date with images placed next to bios, etc. Ste4k 11:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Housemates 'table'

I have removed this table because it contained no cited sources. Images have been removed for copyright reasons. -- 9 cds^(talk) 12:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Cerda

I am positive that he wasn't evicted, he was offered money to leave or stay i remember vaguely. I think it was 10,000 or 5,000 cant remember.

Do you remember the term they did use on the show? --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 03:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have only vague memories of this... I seem to recall there were 2 separate houses. In each house three HMs were summonded to diary room and offered the option of swapping houses; the catch was that after a week, the housemates who swapped would be up for eviction - voted by viewers - although the evicted housemate would also win a big cash prize. I recall that Ben Archbold also swapped, but Jaime was evicted based on viewer votes and won the cash. Asa01 04:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, BB03 really was the most complicated of them all... Well, the evic colour can be removed until a better term can be thought of. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 11:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found the recaps in the behindbigbrother archives linked at the bottom of the article:

http://www.behindbigbrother.com/2003/05/season-3-day-17/

http://www.behindbigbrother.com/2003/05/season-3-days-20-and-21/

BB asked for one male and one female volunteer from each house who wasn't nominated. As Claire was the only female in the square house who wasn't nominated, she was automatically selected, but was given the option of being replaced by a male. The four housemates were told that one of them would be evicted, but the other three would be immune. They were also told about the $10,000 prize money but were forbidden to tell the other housemates or to try to provoke them into evicting them. More detail at the links.

Not upgraded to C-Class

This article needs some kind of reliable sources and references before it can be moved to C-Class. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 22:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JAIME CERDA ********

Regina and Ben were swapped to the square house (and Reggie had a pregnancy scare) Jaime and Claire were swapped to the round house. each house then had a secret ballot of who they wanted to stay and when the results came in, it was Jaime who was evicted. THEN they all found out that he had won some money for being the victim of the twist. no one knew before hand there was a prize for leaving...

Actually, the four who swapped over did know, but I don't think they were allowed to tell any of the other housemates. Cyclone49 02:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brett's surname

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/04/29/1051381939201.html

Found his surname - Jensen.

Entry Dates

Didn't Jo enter on Day 2, not Day 1 as stated? And I think Saxon was later in the week, too (Day 5?)

NO SOURCES

All information on this page needs to be sourced and cited. It is completely unverified. I've added fact tags to key parts of the article that need to be sourced. Please make the effort to take care of them instead of just removing them. They are there because this article needs attention. This article has been on Wikipedia:Cleanup since June 2006 for lack of sources. Could a fan help us get it taken care of? Thank you. --Lendorien 13:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these 'citation needed' requests are hard to understand. Why question the statement 'Chrissie and Daniel came second and third respectively.'? -- Barrylb 14:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, all information in an article needs to be sourced. Otherwise it's just hearsay. Any information regarding winners of a show like this should be sourced. Either from a news article or a book. Lack of sources is a real problem on Wikipedia. Sourcing helps insure that information in articles is trustworthy. --Lendorien 14:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think such sources exist. The only sources may be the show itself. What do you suggest we do? -- Barrylb 12:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further, I think the issues you raise are far bigger than just this article and we won't achieve anything have citation needed tags just for this one. All other Big Brother articles are similar. I think the issues should be discussed in another location. -- Barrylb 12:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BB03CLOSE.jpg

Image:BB03CLOSE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Kim back in

For some reason Kim Drury had been removed from the list of housemates, so I've added her back in. Also added back in the surnames of Carlo and Leah, and added Joanne's maiden name in as that was what she was known as at the time. Not sure if Leah's surname is still White, as someone has said she married Jaime, is there any source for that? Likewise, is there any source for her being on an internet forum? And is Carlo's section a bit biased? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.134.209.48 (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations at start of series

For the first week (possibly the second as well?), didn't housemates nominate to save and evict, with the housemates with the lowest save votes being put up for eviction? I remember Patrick nominated to save Joanne, not evict her, and it was only his nomination points which saved her from being up.

Also, I think the article needs a little more information on Jaime's eviction if anyone is sure of the details. Is it on youtube? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.198.98.30 (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie & Jamie

Both Jamies are on the Results table, but it's impossible to tell which one is which. Please add surname initials to the table. 70.68.74.65 (talk) 06:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big Brother 1 (Australia) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big Brother (Australia season 1) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]