Talk:Bifurcation theory
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bifurcation theory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Infinite-period bifurcation page were merged into Bifurcation theory on 25 April 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the Heteroclinic bifurcation page were merged into Bifurcation theory on 25 April 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the Homoclinic bifurcation page were merged into Bifurcation theory on 25 April 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Untitled
[edit]Wikipedia lacks entries on "Center manifold theorem" and "transformation to normal form" --Anonymous
Lets make the article A-Class
[edit]Let us make a concerted effort to make this article A-Class as soon as we can. Here is list of topics working on which should lead to improvement in the quality of the article:
- Making the language more rigorous: There are several statements in the article that are not mathematically precise. While such statements are make the article more readable at times, but I think that in this case many need to be re-written. Consider, for example, the first line of the article: "a bifurcation occurs when a small smooth change made to the parameter". This statement means that there can indeed be a non-smooth small change in a parameter, which is incorrect. Later in the article there are claims to the effect that all bifurcations are related to eigenvalues crossing the imaginary axis, which is not true (flip bifurcation or global bifurcations being counter examples). Also, not all global bifurcations occur due to "collision" of two objects in the phase-space. In short, there are many language and detail related changes that need to be made.
- More "coverage" required: Presently the article does not cover many important topics in bifurcation theory. Here is an incomplete list of topics that need to be included:
- Theory of normal forms
- Center manifold theory
- Bifurcation diagrams
- Poincare maps
- Perturbation methods (near critical points)
- Method of multiple scales (near critical points)
- Bifurcation of DAEs and related phenomena
- Examples and diagrams for each kind of bifurcation
- Computational aspects of bifurcation theory
- Discussion of software tools like AUTO, MatCont, Content, BifPack, PyCont etc
NOTE: This section is under active development. Please contribute to it and the main article.
- - -
- Well, not to rain on anyone's parade, but -- alas -- the concept of "A-Class" presupposes a specific 'class' with respect to the audience's level of education & specialization. Already, even within the above request, Wikipedia mathematics articles in general slip almost unconsciously, almost always, into inaccessible jargon. This is not just an affliction of Wikipedia, by the way: MOST mathematicians can't access most math journal articles. Fact...and it is due to specialization within mathematics. If I could wave a magic wand and fix the problem (regrettably, I cannot) it would be to create a CAUTION label for *all* math articles on Wikipedia that reminds editors that all articles -- even mathematical -- can, should and must be written at the 7th grade reading level...just as "real" encyclopedias are. As regards opinions on this apparently intractable problem, "Your mileage may vary." Be well...and be honest (we all need you to be as such...and so do you). --104.15.130.191 (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bifurcation theory/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Can be made more accessible. Add short descriptions of the bifurcations; normal form theory. Perhaps importance should be high. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 12:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bifurcation theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060502064218/http://monet.physik.unibas.ch/~elmer/pendulum/nldyn.htm to http://monet.physik.unibas.ch/~elmer/pendulum/nldyn.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Proposed Merger
[edit]The articles on Indefinite-period, homoclinic, and heteroclinic bifurcation are all stubs. The information in them can easily be fit into this article by expanding the Global bifurcations section. Furthermore, this merge will improve the quality this article by adding more information and more sources to it. ElectroChip123 (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 07:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Motif
[edit]I deleted this claim from the lede:
"Henri Poincaré also later named various types of stationary points and classified them with motif[clarify]."
Motive (algebraic geometry) appears to offer an explanation of what a "motif" is. But it seems to be a branch of maths that was developed after Poincaré's time. I can't find anything that links Poincaré with motifs. The claim is in the lede, which is supposed to be a summary of content in the main body; but this claim isn't a summary of anything in the body.
I'm not a mathematician, and I can't understand what I've read about motives/motifs.
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Mathematics
- Start-Class vital articles in Mathematics
- Start-Class mathematics articles
- Mid-priority mathematics articles
- Start-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Start-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Systems articles
- High-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in dynamical systems
- WikiProject Systems articles