Talk:Bicast leather
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article needs to contain more information hah! if you sell furniture do not show this to your customers. M~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.185.191.18 (talk) 22:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
The following does not sound very neutral to me, doesn't wikipedia have NPoV guidelines? "The purpose of using a hide backing appears to be little more than an attempt by manufacturers to justify the use of the word 'leather' as it is not exposed anywhere underneath its covering of polyurethane and contributes nothing to the look and feel of the end product." 99.240.128.108 (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Good point. I removed the paragraph. -- Donald Albury 00:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
i reinstated the main point about it not really being leather and not allowed to be sold as such in some countries. The point that the hide backing used contributes nothing to the look and feel of the end product is valid and should remain. This gives a much more accurate description of what bicast really is. Nigel Gomm 19 October 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigelgomm (talk • contribs) 19:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
for verification that "the hide backing contributes nothing to the look and feel of the end product" follow link 3 and examine the first photograph.--Nigelgomm (talk) 20:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- The opening sentence contains the passage, "...(also known as...split leather...) is a split leather...", which begs the question, "what is split leather?" You can't define something as itself because that is meaningless. Searching for "split leather" redirects to this article. Many people use "split leather" as a synonym for suede, which it apparently is not. The intro should have a better explanation, or perhaps a link to a new article describing "split leather". 12.233.146.130 (talk) 01:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Just a point - I visited the site to see what the "PU" in PU Leather stood for. The article doesn't address that question. It seems like it should.68.205.152.174 (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Pat P
- Added a note for clarification that 'PU leather' is short for 'polyurethane-leather' - just had to explain this to a friend who was confused while looking at this page.Ptrimby (talk) 21:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
It seems that few people that "PU leather" contains cow skin. Most people seem to think "PU leather" is artificial. Does "PU leather" indeed contain polyurethane AND cow skin (inner layer)? And if so, why such widespread nonsense on the subject (whereby it is articifial)?
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Bicast leather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100106065749/http://www.mainlychairs.co.nz:80/leather%20advice.htm to http://www.mainlychairs.co.nz/leather%20advice.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)