Talk:Bible (screenwriting)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Writing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

examples?

Could someone possibly link to a few?--Shinto 03:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Googling for some samples. Daniel Case 05:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a couple of examples. They're not really great though - it's hard to find any because "bible" matches so much crap. -- Nils Jeppe 02:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link for the Freaks and Geeks series bible is broken. I tried to find it elsewhere but could not. 72.200.154.201 04:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about some history of these bibles? I've always been led to believe the the very first was made by Gene Roddenberry for the original Star Trek, and that prior to that point the writers did not pay much attention to the sort of continuity that these bibles can provide. Wikipedia is the perfect place to document or debunk this. --Keeves (talk) 13:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we should. If you are willing to, do the research ... there should be something reliable out there on this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]