Talk:Bibby Line
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bibby Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110517040215/http://www.bibbyline.co.uk:80/downloads/shropshire.pdf to http://bibbyline.co.uk/downloads/shropshire.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
SS Dorsetshire
[edit]Someone added the following sentence to the article, which was probably intended for the the section on former fleet.: Include the troop ship SS Dorsetshire which was converted to a migrant ship after WWII.
British migrants sailed from Liverpool UK to Fremantle Australia in the early 1950s.
It's unreferenced, and I can't find a reference to an SS Dorsetshire that might help verify the sentence. Suggestions welcome so this an be re-added with a reliable source attached. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Some proposed changes
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
− | The company | + | The company worked with national charity The Reader in 2021 to understand and report potential links of its founder John Bibby, to the historical transatlantic slave trade. |
https://www.thereader.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Calderstones-Park-and-its-links-to-slavery.pdf IanW2024 (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing this link, but nowhere does it say that The Reader worked with the company to look into Liverpool's relationship with the slave trade (I am not saying that it did not - absence of evidence etc. etc.).
- This being said it is also an odd thing to put this sentence in the leade of an article, and there are many, many wrongs to asserting a negative (the previous version was no better). I've simply removed the sentence - the whole discussion / letter thing is anyway discussed at length further down in the History section. Superboilles (talk) 21:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class Merseyside articles
- Low-importance Merseyside articles
- WikiProject Merseyside articles
- Start-Class Transport articles
- Unknown-importance Transport articles
- Start-Class maritime transport task force articles
- Unknown-importance maritime transport task force articles
- Maritime transport task force articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
- Implemented requested edits