Talk:Bhattiprolu

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

linkless

I have wikified this page, and tried to link it to relevant articles. Mattisse 22:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buddist Stupa location

The words "chinna lanja dibba" have profane meaning and looks like spam. The citation given there does not give those names. It might be the case that that is real name, but can we atleast remove the citation? Mlpkr 12:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

It is not spam. 'Lanja' in Telugu language means Prostitute. When Buddism fell out of favour (around 6th century AD) the people ascribed such names to Buddhist monasteries and stupas. The usage of the names continues till today.

In response to your question on my talk page, I was wikifying articles in the backlogged "To Do List" section last August. Bhattiprolu was there. I tried to wikify this article to help out and spent a considerable amount of energy trying to find reference citations and help the article out. The words you refer to were already there: [1] and were not put there by me. I have no idea what they mean. I was trying to do my best. Sorry if I did something wrong. I have now learned not to try to improve India articles. I removed the citations I added to the page that you are objecting to. Sorry to have upset you. Sincerely, --Mattisse 13:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, please try to improve. These are exceptional cases. Mlpkr 17:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bhattiprolu script

See Talk:Telugu language#early epigraphy. Also, according to Bhattiprolu alphabet, that alphabet is a variant of Brahmi, not a progenitor. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bhattiprolu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]