Talk:Bhargava Rama

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism High‑importance

	Hinduism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Parashurama

Parasurama is the nickname of Bhargava Rama. So merge Parasurama into this article and put a redirect in the Parasurama article. But this should be done after careful reading :user:Aanand Pranav Sharma

Already, in Parashurama, under Other Names, Bhargava is listed. So just merge and maybe put in a redirect.

Auther: I have read the article: Parasurama, which gives more importent to mythology. My articles tedns to separate out mythology from comprehencable facts. For example the concept of Parasurama, as an incarnation of Vishnu is a mythological concept, where as the dispute between Bhargavas and Kshatriyas in which Parasurama playing a major role is a comprehencable fact. I would like to provide a link from article : Bhargava Rama to the article Parasurama, like this:- For knowing about the myhtological aspects of Bhargava Rama, refer the article:-Parasurama.

Please express your views at Talk:Parashurama.--Redtigerxyz 14:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the line "This article deals with the historical aspects of Bhargava Rama" because the article uses the Mahabharata is an epic, NOT a history book. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]