Talk:Bhar

India: Bihar / Madhya Pradesh / Uttar Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Rajbhar are also known as Rajput,Singh,

Rolling back article

@Sitush: I have rolled this article back to the last unmangled version (by Sitush in April 2014). The last sentence in particular had been rendered meaningless by later deletions and other edits. I have also merged back in cited information from 2012 (again at the last edit by Sitush) which seems to be useful but got overwritten by years on nonsense. SpinningSpark 23:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge dicussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

No merge on the grounds that equivalence is refuted in published sources. Klbrain (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If the two articles - Bhar and Rajbhar - are indeed synonymous then, of course, they should be merged. We have a source that says this is so but the "states" series of The People of India is not particularly reliable, based as it is on plagiarised material from Raj-era ethnonographic books etc. Can anyone confirm/deny the synonymity? And suggest which of the two names is more commonly used? - Sitush (talk) 03:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush: To the best of my knowledge, both are synonymous. It appears that the people of this caste started to use title (second name) "Rajbhar" while the name of the caste was popularly known as "Bhar" (though it may now be seen as an offensive term). We have two related articles, i.e. Suhaldev who is considered to be a legendary king of this tribe "Bhar" (of course along with other claims, but still it proves that the community in question here was called "Bhar"); and another article about the present leader of this community Om Prakash Rajbhar (using "Rajbhar" as his title). References provided in Suhaldev article - Gazetteer of Oudh mentions such a tribe named "bhar" as well as this one too. PIB, GoI Release mentions both as same community. this one can be seen to get some insights though not much reliable. I would suggest, if this article is primarily focused on the caste, we should go with Bhar. --SM7^--talk-- 14:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The People Groups website and the Gazetteer are not very reliable, as you know. The government SC/ST/OBC lists are always problematic - there is ambiguity regarding whether they are treating the two as synonyms or related etc, and that is why we tend not to use them. I suspect that there is some sanskritisation involved in this somewhere. - Sitush (talk) 14:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And here we go re: claims of past glory. I'm going to have to read up quite a bit on these people. - Sitush (talk) 15:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

हिंदुस्थान वासी just removed the merge tags and redirect Rajbhar to this article but did not leave an explanation. I presume they thought there was consensus for a move but I would like to see that made explicit. Since I appear to have been sitting on the fence a bit, there isn't really any strong consensus as yet. - Sitush (talk) 17:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books which suggest they are different groups include this, this and possibly this, as well as this. There are others. - Sitush (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush: Given that there are references against, and this discussion is getting rather stale, time for a close? Klbrain (talk) 09:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wrong information

Suheldev is not belong to Rajbhar community please remove wrong information in this article because Rajbhar community not prove the suheldev belong to his community Vijay Parshuram (talk) 09:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]