Talk:Bhale Bhale Magadivoy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

@Pavanjandhyala: Don't see any major issues with it. A neat, little article that passes the GA criteria. Congratulations yet again, Pavan!  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the article, Ssven2! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)