Talk:Bhāskara I

Bhāskara I was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 22, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Hinduism

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics High‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

Untitled

Apologies for my (self-corrected) mistake. I should have read the article more closely. I changed the comma to a decimal point (which was one of the first things that threw me) and I'll leave it to someone else to judge whether this becomes a good article. Cedars 17:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GA nomination

Overall, the article is good, but it is seriously lacking in the Biography section. Also, the article loses encyclopedic tone in places, where it begins using rhetorical questions. An image wouldn't hurt either. If any those objections are addressed, it would easily be a GA. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 21:42, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the allegorical representation of number 2 has been described as "wings" probably from the sanskrit word PAKSHA. this word in one sense means wings. But this has another meaning also. in fact that should be regarded as the correct one. the word "paksha" also means lunar fortnight. Since every month usually consists of 2 lunar fortnights, the bright and the dark, so one cannot think of a single lunar fortnight. they always come as twins symbolising the number 2 as the only meaning that can be derived out of the word. Subhankar Dasgupta, Taldanga, Chinsurah, Dist Hooggly, West Bengal, India, pincode 712105 mobile no 09830437560, ph- 033-26833801 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.209.85 (talk) 04:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Year

The solar year was calculated as 365.25875684 days by Bhaskaracharya in the 5th century, hundreds of years before the astronomer Smart.

Source: Annual Research Journal - 2000, by the Institute for Rewriting Indian (and World) History

A similar article to the one above was originally sent into the Indian Express newspaper, June 22, 1999, by Maxwell Pareira. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.11.3 (talk) 12:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further contributions

Corrected a typo (x,y) = (6,7) to (x,y) = (6,17) Drajput (talk) 21:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjitr303 (talk) 05:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC) can anyone tell me how did he find the next values for pell's equation using one set of values. and also tell me the method for the general form Nx^2 + k = y^2 ? I have found that for Nx^2 + k = y^2 if 'a' & 'b' are corresponding values for x and y respectively then '(2*a*b)/√k' and '(2(b^2) - k)/√k' are also the solutions. can anyone tell whether it is correct and if there is any article related to it?[reply]

I think the articles you want are Chakravala method and Bhaskara's lemma. AFAIK this was the work of the later Brahmagupta and Bhaskara II, not Bhaskara I. Shreevatsa (talk) 05:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]