Jump to content

Talk:Between Five and Seven

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Between Five and Seven/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
This article offers some interesting information, but it deviates significantly from the album style guide, and in the absence of more citations, I can't tell if some of it is original research. Text sections be moved above "list" sections, including the "track list" and "personnel." The "songs" section is a bit difficult to read as it is, and improved sourcing could help demonstrate that claims like "this song, however, appears to be several years older" are not original research. The musical personnel, interspersed through the songs, should be separated into a "personnel" section. Sourcing would be useful elsewhere, as well. For instance, who said that the album has an "impressive array of supporting musicians"? If somebody else said, it we need to attribute. If they didn't, we need to revise that to neutral text.

Lacking a list of musicians in a separate "personnel" section, this should be a "start," but it does technically have an additional section of prose, though these sections may not be substantial prose. WI:IAR makes it a "C." To reach "B", please address sourcing and layout issues and gather prose sections together to enhance readability. Thanks.

Article requirements:
Green tickY Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Between Five and Seven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Between_Five_and_Seven&oldid=1211156740"