Talk:Bettye Swann

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bettye Swann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denials of death

I see there's an edit war going on with users adding/deleting death information. To be clear, Facebook is full of posts denying that she has actually died, including Kent Records, her family and friends. It appears that the death of a woman in North Carolina by the same name may be responsible for the mix up. As such, it's pretty irresponsible of Soul Tracks to issue a news piece on her alleged death, but the fact that they even speculate as to whether she has really died is enough to keep her in Category:Living people in my opinion as WP:BLP must be respected. Thanks Jkaharper (talk) 00:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that she had died was on this page for 26 days - from 27 January until 22 February, unchallenged by anyone (including myself) - so it is likely that others (such as record companies) picked it up from here. They, and we, obviously should have checked more carefully. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are blameless. SoulTracks remain to be blamed, as they insist on leaving some kind of "obituary" (they call it "tribute") to her work on their published page, which should have been removed by now. (I myself have asked them to remove it.) I was the main sucker for this inaccuracy, so I apologise for that, but was convinced the previously reliable source would have checked their facts deep as can be. Their future position as a reliable source should really be called into question after this. Ref ^(chew)(do) 14:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are not "blameless". We failed to pick up an unsourced death claim for 26 days (long before Soul Tracks picked it up). Could do better. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We rely on reliable sources - we don't go double-checking their work. That's too far into the realms of original research. I have no guilt in this. If SoulTracks got dumped as a reliable source, I wouldn't make that mistake again. Their fault. Ref ^(chew)(do) 15:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can only assume that you are misunderstanding me. The fact that her death was reported on this page for 26 days was nothing to do with Soul Tracks. It was unsourced. It had no source. Soul Tracks, and the record companies that they used as sources, may well have got the information from Wikipedia. Soul Tracks was only added as the source after it had already been reported here for 26 days. Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So it was "sourced", but by a Facebook link - which is as good as unsourced. We failed to inspect the source link, but were fooled because it appeared to be sourced, given the small print number within squared parenthesis at the end of the subject line. I agree with you on that point. Ref ^(chew)(do) 23:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. This edit on 27 January was entirely unsourced - not from Facebook, not from Soul Tracks - and remained in place, still unsourced, for 26 days. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]