Talk:Betty King

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Betty King appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 2008 Australian judge Betty King referred to herself as the "queen of banning things"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia: Victoria / Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Betty King is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

DYK hooks?

As this article is pretty close to DYK length, does anyone have any thoughts on a DYK hook? There are quite a lot of interesting factoids in the article. I'm tempted to suggest "… did you know that Australian judge Betty King once claimed to have had her Wikipedia biography deleted?" but that might be a little cheeky. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She may be technologically illiterate, leading her to come to that conclusion erroneously. Absolutely she is notable enough for a Wikipedia entry, and has no right to decide whether this entry will exist. I'll put in a second reference for her claim - she said it outright in a second interview. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, there are other instances of high-level involvement in article deletion. WWGB (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Associate Judge"

Why is Her Honour described as an "associate judge"? She is a Justice of the Supreme Court. The term is linked to "Associate Justice", also a term unknown in Victoria. Avalon (talk) 07:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it seems to have a very particular meaning in the Victorian context that would not apply to King:[1]. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the term 'Associate Judge' in Victoria means something quite different to what it means in other places. Judge King is not an associate judge. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Betty King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080529141528/http://www.vicbar.com.au/pdf/134Welcomes.pdf to http://www.vicbar.com.au/pdf/134Welcomes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]