Talk:Better in Time/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cavie78 (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

A pretty decent article overall. I have a small number of fairly minor concerns which are detailed below. Cavie78 (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): (MoS):

   A few concerns with the clarity of certain parts of the prose are detailed below.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):

   A concern with the lack of refs in the lead relating to direct quotes and some possibly contentious information.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• "...tells the history of a girl who cannot forget her ex-partner" History seems an odd word to use here - would suggest replacing with "story" or rephrasing the sentence.
• "In its review of the album, Chung Ah-young of The Korea Times..." Should be his/her review unless you remove the reviewer's name.
• The Rolling Stone review shouldn't be in the article. If you are waiting to find source details put it in your sandbox then move back to the article when you have them.
• "...and being blocked by Duffy's "Mercy"." This isn't very well worded, would suggest changing to "being beaten to the number one spot by Duffy's "Mercy".
• ""Better in Time" entered the country chart on 22 February 2009 at number seventy-nine, where it stayed for three weeks." What country chart?
• "Moreover, "Better in Time" was also a success in the chart, it reached the number seven on the week ending 2 August 2008." I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Are you still talking about the European Hot 100 Singles chart? If so this needs rewording to something like "The single eventually reached number seven on the chart in the week ending 2 August 2008."

  All done Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 18:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Am happy to promote - good work! Cavie78 (talk) 18:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your review :D Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 18:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)