Talk:Better Than Chocolate

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Canada: British Columbia / Cinema / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Comments

I found Better than chocolate to be one of the best movies I have ever had the pleasure of viewing. I really related to the themes in it, the hatred of the skinheads and the mother, who is concerned but also controlling...she grows the most in the entire film. one thing that I realised the other night was that Kim has no last name, in fact I dont think any of them have last names. Which, I guess is no big deal but I think the characters would be a little more rounded if they had last names. also, I think the only problem I have with the film is that it felt like it went so fast. I dont know whether its just the time span that I'm missing e.g. In the van when Kim and Maggie get towed...I mean they must be there for a while to get towed. You actually see someone on their way to work, lock their bike to the van which suggests a long stay. so, Thats the ranty part of this section over with, now for the parts I found to be absoloutely brilliant...

Okay, where do I start?! The art work in this film is amazing...hats off to whoever did it, I swear, to get that van to look like that and those pictures to look the way they did they must have put some hard slog in. the portrit of Maggie in chalks is amazing, and the van is even better, not to mention the stuff set out when she's drawing tony. The music...wow! the only thing I don't like about the music is the fact that half the songs I like on the soundtrack are nowhere to be found...so If anyone can lead me to the Ani DiFranco track thats playing when maggie is collecting dildos up I would appreciate it.... thats the end of my discussion for now.

Fair use rationale for Image:Better than chocolate poster.jpg

Image:Better than chocolate poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Outerbridge as Judy

His portrayal of Judy is thought by myself and my friends to be one of the very best portrayals of a transwoman in all of filmdom. ShannonLikeHoney (talk) 16:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Better Than Chocolate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]