Talk:Bethesda system

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pathology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Further work required

Just created this to link the HSIL & LSIL pages appropriately. It needs more info in the history & reasoning behind the system. The LSIL & HSIL pages should also be updated with more pathology info, pictes etc, rather than duplicating them here.... Alternative method would be to redirect hsil & lsil here and have them as subsections! Mattopaedia (talk) 02:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seem to be getting a lot of little articles in this topic. I think the TBS and LSIL and HSIL information could as well be developed as part of the Pap smear page for a while - until they get big enough to merit splitting. Not that there isn't potentially enough material on the topics, and if these expand rapidly fine. But if they just sit here being small for a while, we should look at combining some of them. Zodon (talk) 10:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Result was to merge Zodon (talk) 07:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All's been quiet for a month or so since I last fiddled about with TBS, HSIL & LSIL. I was really hoping someone else (read:some keen medical student!) would take the initiative and start the merge ball rolling while I work and prepare lectures for medical students. Oh well...

If there's no issues after 2/52 (that'll be 17/02/09) then lets make it happen! Mattopaedia (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge those articles here. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as a medical biller there is value to keeping these separate. A medical biller would not necessarily know to look on the pap smear page for this topic if it got subsumed there. This is a diagnosis and the pap smear is a test that is used to help detect multiple diagnoses. HSIL and Pap Smear are not synonyms so deserve separate pages. 72.166.189.251 (talk) 18:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If they were merged, the article titles would redirect to the merged page. One wouldn't have to know to look there. If one searched for HSIL, etc. it would take you to the article, just as it does now. So the question is not whether to remove the names HSIL, etc., but whether to combine the coverage of these related diagnoses in a combined article. Combining them would reduce need to duplicate background, and make maintenance easier (fewer articles to watch/update). If/when the articles grow large enough that it needs splitting, it could again be divided. Zodon (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Zodon, and at this stage I'm only looking at merging the diagnostic classifications under the Bethesda System (LSIL & HSIL) into the bethesda system article. (I'm not sure that AGUS is a TBS classification or not, but I'm leaning toward not without actually looking it up). At some later stage I (or somebody) should look at Pap smear, CIN etc and tidy the whole mess up; this is just where I decided to start. But again, the redirect links would remain. Mattopaedia (talk) 06:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I found the article on AGUS, which should also be merged, so added merge tags, etc. to it. Zodon (talk) 05:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger done

HSIL and LSIL articles have been merged into subsections of this article. There was little of importance on their respective talk pages (Talk:HSIL, Talk:LSIL), so I haven't bothered transcluding them to this talk page. Mattopaedia (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bethesda System → Bethesda system –

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased.

In particular, lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles, such as Hickam's dictum and HEENT examination. $Tony (talk)$ 11:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Proposed merge

A merge has been proposed in 2010 between the content of dyskaryosis and this article. I feel it is logical for these two to be merged. Opinions? LT90001 (talk) 12:00, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No action and no comments for 3+ years, have removed tags.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bethesda system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223051738/http://nih.techriver.net:80/ to http://nih.techriver.net/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114020353/http://www.bethesda2001.cancer.gov/ to http://bethesda2001.cancer.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]