Jump to content

Talk:Beth Phoenix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleBeth Phoenix was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 22, 2009Good article nomineeListed
November 25, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 24, 2018, and November 24, 2020.
Current status: Delisted good article

Raw brand

[edit]

She is not performing on the Raw brand. Her return was just for Wrestlemania. WWE.com does not list her as an active superstar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.209.220 (talk) 12:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beth-Phoenix as divas champion.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Beth-Phoenix as divas champion.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Storyline ankle injury"?

[edit]

How do we know this wasn't legit? WWE.com is cited but that makes no sense as they would not break kayfabe on such an incident.

Presumably because she's actually working a match at Extreme Rules 2012. --Jtalledo (talk) 15:17, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resides in Syracuse NY

[edit]

She lives in Syracuse NY as well. Her Twitter and her art site both reflect this that she has a home in Syracuse NY. http://www.etsy.com/shop/glamcanvas

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Beth Phoenix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beth Phoenix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Spouse

[edit]

I notice that in the infobox the spouse is listed as Edge rather than Adam Copeland. Since the spouse is real life rather than storyline would it make more sense to have Adam Copeland as the spouse? This also affects other articles as well so is it some sort of policy? Mobile mundo (talk) 00:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many uncited passages and an orange "citations needed" banner on top of the "Other media" section. This is a BLP. Z1720 (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delist, due to uncited statements. I did wonder if simply removing the uncited statements would resolve the problem, but it's a good few years since this became a GA, and it looks like there is quite a lot that has happened since then that should be covered in the article. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.