Talk:Beta Librae

.8 solar masses? I don't buy that for a minute. Regulus has a

Yes, that is ridiculous. Other value seem much more plausible for a B main sequence star. — JyriL ^talk 19:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes are inactive

I clicked on [1], [2], [3] etc to glean details on specific citations but there are no sources quoted, hence I have marked as unreferenced. Pomona17 15:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] fixed (by googling site:www.astronomy.org.nz "Beta Librae"). ... said: Rursus (bork²) 20:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[3] fixed by same method, [2] was not broken when I peeked into it. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 20:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green really?

Have any of you actually seen this reknowned greenness by yourself? If it is green by exhibiting surrounding nebulosities, then this greenness should be an intermittent phenomenon, and the star should usually be blue or white. Personally I've seen a huge lot of green stars, but only if I make the stupid mistake of letting in yellow light from behind my back looking onto a blue or white star through my balcony door. On closing the door, and putting the yellow light off, I see no green star whatsoever, only red, pink, orange, yellow, cream, white and blue – although green stars are quite possible if there is some kind of green emission in it's light. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 20:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Absolute Magnification?

Does anyone know what the absolute magnitude for β Librae is? I read that it's suspected to be a variable star, so does that have anything to do with the lack of data? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Wikipedia Community.

Checks Facts

_{Happy to talk} 20:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beta Librae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060714121424/http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/zubenes.html to http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/zubenes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]