Talk:Best interests

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is incomplete - it talks about best interests as relating to children, but the concept is also relevant as regards treatment of other people who have reduced competence, such as those with cognitive disorders. Will attempt to do something! Tricky (talk) 23:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in urgent need of comprehensive editing: it has an odd and unexplained focus upon (a simplistic interpretation of) English law despite the relevance of the legal concept of "best interest" to relevant US laws.

Also, in terms of assumptions about the global reach of the "best interest" doctrine no mention at all is made of The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction where, even in English law (and relevant US laws), the "best interest" doctrine clearly does not apply.

No discussion. The article will be radically and appropriately edited in due course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.29.81 (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update in development

I agree with the previous poster that this page is missing quite a lot of information. Please check the update that I am preparing and let me know if you have comments.Hipersons (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Best interests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]