Talk:Berwyn Heights, Maryland mayor's residence drug raid/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • There was an edit made on Feb. 1st by an anon IP that changed some wording in the lead. In my opinion, it made the lead slightly POV. I have reverted the edit - if you feel that I was in the wrong, please let me know.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • I've added a couple of fact tags in places where I would like to see references. These two places are especially important because the preceeding sentences include direct quotes.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall this is a very nice article. There are a couple of places where I would like to see references, and one comment on prose, so I am placing this review on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

   OK, looks good. I'm now passing the article to GA status. Dana boomer (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)