Jump to content

Talk:Bertrand Russell's philosophical views

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk-page for: Bertrand Russell views on philosophy.

Created/split from article Bertrand Russell

[edit]

09-Nov-2008: The article "Bertrand Russell" was already 101kb (where 32kb is considered large), so splitting into 3 or 4 parts has reduced each sub-article to 50kb (or less). Bertrand Russell is a subject that is too large for one article: as a very famous man who lived/worked 80 years after college, writing thousands of letters & many books. Also, as a philosopher, his viewpoints will be compared with many other philosophers, causing the article text to explode over 5x times beyond merely stating his viewpoints alone. On 08-Nov-2008, I began the following split:

The sub-articles were copied verbatim from the main-article (approved) text, and now those sections can be greatly trimmed, as short summaries, removing the long quotations which have been moved into the subarticles. Although it can be tempting to condense all information into a single, solid Wikipedia article, the reality is that the man worked 80 years (after college) and changed his viewpoints on many subjects, several times each. When saying "Russell believed...", it is necessary to state the date, before his beliefs changed again. A single Wiki article should not be forced to handle that broad scope of details covering 80 years. It is too stifling when somone wants to add another paragraph to a huge article: there's no room left for improvement. -Wikid77 (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • 09-Nov-2008: After splitting the huge article, I reduced only 10k of text about philosophy, so far, as page-size 91kb. If the 3 sections about "Philosophical work" & "Activism" & Selected bibliography were removed entirely, the main-article size would become 42kb. I plan to reduce the main article's list of Selected works (linking to the full list in "Bertrand Russell views on philosophy"), thereby shortening the text by 7kb to page-size 84kb. The main article was simply too huge for easy trimming. -Wikid77 (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmological or Ontological?

[edit]

I don't know enough about the guy to say which is right, but the article is confusing the ontological argument with the cosmological argument (first cause) in this section:

Though he would later question God's existence, he fully accepted the ontological argument during his undergraduate years:

For two or three years...I was a Hegelian. I remember the exact moment during my fourth year [in 1894] when I became one. I had gone out to buy a tin of tobacco, and was going back with it along Trinity Lane, when I suddenly threw it up in the air and exclaimed: "Great God in Boots! – the ontological argument is sound!" —Bertrand Russell, Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, pg. 60

This quote has been used by many theologians over the years, such as by Louis Pojman in his Philosophy of Religion, who wish for readers to believe that even a well-known atheist-philosopher supported this particular argument for God's existence. However, elsewhere in his autobiography, Russell also mentions:

About two years later, I became convinced that there is no life after death, but I still believed in God, because the "First Cause" argument appeared to be irrefutable. At the age of eighteen, however, shortly before I went to Cambridge, I read Mill's Autobiography, where I found a sentence to the effect that his father taught him the question "Who made me?" cannot be answered, since it immediately suggests the further question "Who made God?" This led me to abandon the "First Cause" argument, and to become an atheist. —Bertrand Russell, Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, pg. 36

This section was created in 2009, see div, by an IP user. -- prokaryotes (talk) 15:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bertrand Russell's views on philosophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bertrand Russell's philosophical views. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ethics and positivism

[edit]

The entry gives the impression that all logical positivists were emotivists/non-cognitivists. This is not true. Schlick, the leader of the circle, was a cognitivist (of the naturalist variety). Please fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.83.60.122 (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bertrand_Russell%27s_philosophical_views&oldid=1199909497"