Talk:Bertha Lum

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Untitled

An issue was raised as to whether the chronology would be better in prose vs. a presentation in point form with dates. My impression is that "chronology" lends itself to a list - ie more succinct and easier to grasp the salient dates and events. In most artist monographs there is a chronology and they are always (as far as I can recall) in point form.

I would suggest prose is appropriate for a biography section - 2 different things. Once again in artist's monographs there is typically a biography portion done in prose. That is, a good monograph has both.

I don't feel strongly about it being changed but am curious to know why someone thinks prose is better for conveying this information.

I would ask the person posting the prose suggestion to reconsider and, if felt appropriate, remove the posting. Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 934C (talk • contribs) 21:07, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]