Talk:Bert Fegg's Nasty Book for Boys and Girls

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Monty Python task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Children's book???

I have to question whether those who categorized this as a children's book actually have ever seen the book in question. It is nothing of the sort. It is a parody of a children's book, to be true, but it is full of adult content and ends with a two-page, gore-filled illustration of Bert Fegg cutting open a monster and letting its entrails fall about. I believe the US edition might have actually be categorized as children's literarture (I have a copy of both the US and UK versions but the US version is packed away at the moment), but that's part of the joke. (That or a major screw-up by the publisher). I have removed all references to this being a children's book and am adding some additional text to indicate that it's a parody. 23skidoo 00:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on your experience of it. I got it when I was about 7 years old and thought it was the best thing ever. Spewing entrails are the kind of thing kids like... or maybe I was just a weird kid. :-)

Could be a POV issue that would have to be left open. Terry Jones wrote other children's books so prob worth comparing with his other work. --Cnbrb 09:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As no other thoughts have been added, it seems best to express this issue neutrally, i.e. open to interpretation. Have reworded article to this effect - leaves the point of view open. --Cnbrb 10:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While reading the article on Terry Jones, I encountered this one... I think I remember reading this book as a child - aged 7 or 8 - having borrowed it from the library, no less...
Does the book contain a two-page diagram of the interior of an airliner, in which the passengers are sitting in individual bowls of jelly ?
86.25.122.91 (talk) 20:36, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of the jokes about this book is having the word "nasty" , associated with a book for "girls & boys". Obviously ,the horrific Dr.Bertram X.Fegg , feels this is the perfect book for children , considering his dislike for children. That said , it's a parody of the sorts of books foisted on British children of a certain age. What I question , is why it's linked as a "Monty Python" book ? It's clearly - always - been marketed as a Terry Jones & Michael Palin project , with zero input from Cleese,Idle,Chapman or Gilliam. Harvey J Satan (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I removed the book from the Monty Python template and removed the template from the article. Garion96 (talk) 00:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]