Jump to content

Talk:Berry Mound

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Hi, I see this page has only recently been created. I am trying to research Berry Mound as I only live 5 minutes from it. Do you have any further info reguarding finds from the site, or who owns it?

Email me at tuesdaycametoosoon@hotmail if you have any more information.

Thank you.

S.Davies Workmonkey20 (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't got any more information than that I've added to the article I'm afraid. The Pastscape link has the official record from the National Monuments Record, and you can find the two archaeological articles in the Transactions of the Birmingham Archaeological Society, which is held in the Birmingham Collection on the sixth floor of the Reference Library in Chamberlain Square.
The information you've added is very interesting, but content in Wikipedia articles needs a reliable source to be cited - where did you get it from? JimmyGuano (talk) 21:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've already exhausted all Solihull library has to offer interms of the archaeological report, Bradford uni did a geophys survey in 2000, I'm trying to get my hands on a copy of that.
The part about "Danes camp field" comes from The history of Birmingham By William Hutton who was writing in the late 18th C I believe. He writes about a paragraph on it which makes for quite interesting reading. Not in the least because he only believes there is one set of fortifications, whereas later it was said there was up to 3 lines of defence. He also believes it was erected in the 9th C, but I think an iron age construction is more likely. Anecdotally there was a sword blade found there in the 70's a hoard of iron knives in the 90's that I'm desperately trying to find out about, they would ideally date the site, or atleast clarify whether the fort was re-used by the Danes which is what i'm really interested in Workmonkey20 (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Workmonkey20 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hutton, though a fine writer, was notoriously inaccurate as a historian - perhaps forgivably so given the paucity of sources and resources at his disposal. He thought Metchley Fort was the work of the Danes as well, but it's been exhaustively excavated over the last century and is entirely Roman. Although the use of Danes Camp etc as alternative names is mentioned by the EH link so should probably be included in the article, if the only source for the suggestion that the Danes actually used the site is Hutton then it probably needs considerable qualification at best. JimmyGuano (talk) 22:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berry Mound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berry Mound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Berry_Mound&oldid=1206265563"