Talk:Bernie Wrightson's Frankenstein

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bernie Wrightson's Frankenstein article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bernie Wrightson's Frankenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=37352
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218093621/http://www.reuben.org/ncs/awards.asp to http://www.reuben.org/ncs/awards.asp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I used blogs as references because...

Hello all!

I just added a bunch of details in the publication history and used a couple blog posts as references because the bloggers were owners of the somewhat rare portfolios I was documenting here. The bloggers posted extensive pictures of the items, including the cover sheets that give an explanation of what the items are. I was just doing the research for myself and thought I'd share it.

I got the warning about not using blogs, but I posted anyway because it's not the blog text I used, but the information in the pictures they posted. So it's actually more of a "primary source" than you'd expect from a blog.

And they're not my blogs. So I'm breaking that rule.

I'm still fairly new to editing wikipedia. If I'm "doing it wrong" feel free to fix it and/or let me know.

SubtleComplexity (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]