Talk:Bernard "BB" Bragg

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This redirect is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 30 October 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Merging

Seems like an obvious merge. Anyone have any thoughts on this? It seems pointless to go through editing all of this when it could be merged. Cleanelephant (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

is this serious? doesnt look like — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.27.129.16 (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Appears to be the same person, so a merge is not only advised, but required. I'm not sure of the justification for creating both pages within two days of each other (I suppose it's possible that two different editors may have created the articles independently without knowledge of the other), but the pages should be merged. From a glance, there appears to be quite a bit of info here that isn't in the Bernard Bragg article (I haven't gone through all the sources to verify all of it), so although it's an obvious candidate for a merge (either redirecting this page to Bernard Bragg or that page here), the two articles should be carefully read and edited to include all relevant/reliably-sourced information from both articles. Granted, this looks like quite a bit of work, but, as far as I'm concerned, there doesn't appear to be any need for reaching a consensus regarding whether to merge. Anyone who has the time/inclination should feel free to "be bold" and begin work on merging the information on both articles into one. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 01:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCEreviewed

Shouldn't copy-edit while there's a merge propsal outstanding. There are two articles on the same person. --Stfg (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]