Talk:Bergen station

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Article title

I see a user has moved the article from "Bergen Station" to "Bergen railway station". I disagree with this move, and not least the rationale: "Match WP:LEAD and downcase". Articles must be titled based on two factors: their actual name (which in this case is a translation of "Bergen stasjon", which is what both general literature, NSB and the National Rail Administration call the station), the Manual of Style and to a certain degree, to fit in with other article names. Any individual railway station is a proper noun, and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization) states "For page titles, always use lowercase after the first word, and do not capitalize second and subsequent words, unless the title is a proper noun." [my emphasis]. Based on these two simple components, all station articles in Norway have the format Foo Station, and having Bergen in a different situation looks out of place. Note that the Norwegian lower-case spelling of "stasjon" is due to Norwegian having different capitalization rules for proper nouns than English. I am aware that probably 90% of all articles on railway stations are incorrectly capitalized, but that is no excuse to increase the error-rate. After all, most people cannot capitalize (it took myself more than two years on the project to figure out the rules). Regards, Arsenikk ^(talk) 07:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For once I have to agree with Arsenikk: "Bergen Railway Station" or "Bergen Station" is a better title than "Bergen railway station". Another acceptable title could possibly be "Bergen (railway station)"/"Bergen (station)" but this would be inconsistent with the other articles on Norwegian stations. --Aqwis (talk) 08:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bergen Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051106172123/http://www.riksantikvaren.no:80/Norsk/Nyhetssenter/Fredninger/2003/?module=Articles;action=Article.publicShow;ID=1406 to http://www.riksantikvaren.no/Norsk/Nyhetssenter/Fredninger/2003/?module=Articles;action=Article.publicShow;ID=1406

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]