Talk:Bensheim

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bensheim article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Germany C‑class Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

Table of content

Hi there, I think there are too many sections in this article and these sections and their order don't comply with the WP:UKCITIES or WP:USCITY - as there is no guideline on cities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany - you can choose which structure you want. Greetings and happy editing. Sebastian scha. (talk) 17:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major inaccuracies in this article. For example, it suggests that: "As the National Security Agency liaison officer, Henry Kissinger was the most important representative of the occupying power, after the official town commander." Kissinger was there as a sergeant in the United States Army in 1945. The National Security Agency didn't even come into existence until November 4, 1952, so how could Kissinger have been the NSA's "liaison officer"? Some basic fact-checking would do this article a world of good! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.114.80 (talk) 17:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible IP vandalism

I've just undone this edit because the ip concerned has vandalised several articles in recent days (see here). I've no idea which figure is correct, so if someone with knowledge of the area can give a definite answer that would be useful. TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bensheim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]