Talk:Bennis v. Michigan
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bennis v. Michigan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who concurred? Who dissented?
[edit]I was looking through the cases Ruth Bader Ginsburg was part of and ran across this one, where I have no idea from reading the Wikipedia article which way she ruled. Could someone who is good at working on leghal articles please fix this? If nobody steps up to the plate I will give it a go, but you really don't want an expert in engineering writing on legal issues... :( --Guy Macon (talk) 03:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Attribution
[edit]References copied from Bennis v. Michigan to Nebraska v. One 1970 2-Door Sedan Rambler (Gremlin), See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Mid-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Michigan articles
- Low-importance Michigan articles
- WikiProject Michigan articles
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class Sex work articles
- Low-importance Sex work articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles