Talk:Benjamin Twos

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contract bridge, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Contract bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Contract bridgeWikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridgeTemplate:WikiProject Contract bridgeContract bridge articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing

@Boeing720: the existing sources look like ads and don't say anything about the topic. There are any number of books that could be cited here. Use one of those. If you can't, I'll restore the redirect. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No if you play yourself play at sobridge.com , just put the marker above the question mark for a 2D opening. (Free) It's apparently also known as "Benjamin Two's" (2C/D) - I've added a source for that. PPlease note though - I'm not saying it's the only 2D-opening. Neither the best. Just that it stands to "some reason" that both minors are used in a similar way. Its origin is unclear to me still, but not invented by me and not at Sobridge or Funbridge either. Perhaps "Benjamin Two Diamonds" is a better name ? Boeing720 (talk) 03:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying this is a feature/option for computer bridge software? power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki:No - not any longer, at least. You got me investigating further. It's sooner an old convention forgotten , but has regained some popularity. But the article name should perhaps be changed to "Benjamin Twos" and include 2C/2D as of this article. There is even a story behind these bids. Look here [1] - reliable ? Boeing720 (talk) 16:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We even have an article on Albert Benjamin, which mentions these two strong 2-minors openings together with 2-major openings as weak. Boeing720 (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]