Talk:Benign hypertension

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Merge?

Given that this is a historical concept, perhaps it might be better merged as a paragraph of hypertension (e.g. history)? Alternatively the current historical content of hypertension could be summarised, and all historical content forked under the name history of hypertension. Just some thoughts, to place this content into context?

There are a few sources that might be better replaced by secondary sources unless used purely in an illustrative fashion. JFW | T@lk 19:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks. I think that is a reasonable suggestion. The only reason for keeping it seperate at present is the existence of benign hypertension in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD9) which, as I understand it, is still used in the US (although practically nowhere else), with an implementation date for ICD10 in October 1, 2013. When I get a chance I will try and replace some of the primary with secondary sources as you suggest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adh30 (talk • contribs) 06:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]