Talk:Benelux Tour

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Name

Is the current name "Eneco Tour of Benelux" the right one? The official website and the uci calender give as name "Eneco Tour". Also most cycling-dedicated website, such as cyclingnews and cyclingwebsite, use this name, although this is not consistent. Cyclingnews.com uses "eneco tour of benelux" for the editions until 2007, and cyclingwebsite has as main name "benelux tour".

The number of google hits are:

"eneco tour" -benelux: 192000

"eneco tour of benelux": 4870

"eneco tour of the benelux": 240 (I included this because this makes more sense to my grammatical senses.)

I have never seen it reported as "eneco tour of the benelux" in Dutch newspapers. Is it used in that way in English newspapers? If not, I would suggest we use the official shorter name "Eneco Tour". --EdgeNavidad (talk) 15:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Djharrity moved it three years ago, saying, "most publications/references use the entire Eneco Tour of Benelux (otherwise, it would be akin to Amgen Tour (for Amgen Tour of California))". I'm not struck by that reasoning, it should be on the most common name used elsewhere in English. Google results in English suggest:

"eneco tour" -benelux -wikipedia 10,700 of which 521 of the first 1000 are unique
"eneco tour of benelux" -wikipedia 138
"eneco tour of the benelux" -wikipedia 17

I think that makes it quite clear. Severo^TC 18:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eneco Tour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110914131734/http://www.memoire-du-cyclisme.net:80/etapes/eta_eneco_tour.php to http://www.memoire-du-cyclisme.net/etapes/eta_eneco_tour.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]