Talk:Ben Barton

Ben Barton was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 10, 2017	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 26, 2016.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ben Barton (pictured) was able to cheaply purchase a large amount of land in what would become Redlands, California, due to Brigham Young's recall of the Mormon outpost there?

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Kentucky Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Cheap land?

Was $10 per acre for California land (far from gold rush) in the 1850s 'cheap'? It seems in line with what I found rooting around on the internet.Mukogodo (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a consensus among the sources discussing the purchase that it was "cheap" for its time. James (^talk/_contribs) 20:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

I added sections to the article so that it the article can have a lead, as the first paragraph was already functioning as a lead but was not separated out from the rest of the article. Someone else may want to adjust the wording of the headings but I gave it a shot. Knope7 (talk) 18:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead sentence

The lead sentence: "Ben Barton ... was an American doctor, landowner, vintner, politician, and early white settler" is a mess. Reading it, I have no idea why he was notable. Please see Winston Churchill for how to properly structure the lead paragraph, emphasize what the person is known for, and not make the lead sentence unwieldy. Keep in mind that WP:BLPLEAD states: "The lead sentence should describe the person as he or she is commonly described in reliable sources. ... avoid overloading the lead paragraph with various sundry roles; instead, emphasize what made the person notable. Incidental and non-notable roles (i.e. activities that are not integral to the person's notability) should usually not be mentioned in the lead paragraph." It also states: "In general, a position, activity, or role should not be included the lead paragraph if: a) the role is not otherwise discussed in the lead, b) the role is not significantly covered in the body of the article, or, c) the role is auxiliary to a main profession of the person". Additionally, WP:LEADSENTENCE states: "Try to not overload the first sentence by describing everything notable about the subject. Instead use the first sentence to introduce the topic, and then spread the relevant information out over the entire lead." LK (talk) 07:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded. James (^talk/_contribs) 04:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"White settler"???

It's often considered to be insulting to refer to people by the supposed color of their skin. No I don't propose that he be called a "pink settler," but perhaps "Anglo-American" or similar? I'll leave the choice to others. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 13:51, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ben Barton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BlackJack (talk · contribs) 15:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I'll do this review. Jack | ^{talk page} 15:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result

Well, I'm afraid this is an immediate failure:

it is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria:
it contains copyright infringements:
it has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid — e.g., {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}}:
the article is not stable due to edit warring on the page:

The article as is would make a very good introduction but it fails the "broad in its coverage" criterion among the six GA criteria. Jack | ^{talk page} 16:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]