This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Hi @JayBeeEll: you cannot remove links to content simply because you personally cannot view the content. If this were true of all websites, we could not link to The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, etc., etc. Those news websites also require a login to access much or all of their content. Paywalled content is perfectly valid, per the policy at WP:PAYWALL. If you need help verifying the content, you may request it in places like WP:REREQ, as mentioned in the core Wikipedia policy WP:V. Please revert your edit, or allow me to. ɱ(talk)22:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ɱ, my feeling is that the URLs could be included, per WP:REREQ ("A site that requires registration or a subscription should not be linked unless the website itself is the topic of the article or the link is part of an inline reference"). The citations should be formatted to make it clear that a subscription is required, e.g. by adding {{subscription required}}. However, given that the citations all seem to require a Columbus Metropolitan Library card (something I doubt many New Yorkers, or even many readers in general, have), is it possible to provide a URL that is viewable by anyone with a Newsbank account? – Epicgenius (talk) 14:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I tried even contacting Newsbank months ago to ask for a better way to create or share URLs from their database; there isn't. ɱ(talk)16:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a paywall, it's a "Users must live in Ohio" wall [1]. By itself, that's no better for most readers than providing no link at all. Worse, maybe, if the reader is having the kind of day when the Internet feels like it's being awful just to spite you.... There's got to be a better way. (The article is available through newspapers.com and thus through the Wikipedia Library [2], but the UI is being uncooperative in generating a usable clip for me today.) XOR'easter (talk) 14:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, if you want to find more accessible links, sure, but in theory and in practice, one link that lets some readers read an article is better than no link at all. All this hate to a registration-required page is unfounded in our policies and guidelines. ɱ(talk)16:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A link that fills the space which should be occupied by a better link gives the illusion of a helpful citation and can make it less likely that the article is improved. XOR'easter (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's your opinion, but often there is no "better link". Nor did anyone substantially improve this article since its creation anyhow. ɱ(talk)16:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done with new links, even if a paywall is far more costly than asking one of many Ohio Wikimedians for the text. ɱ(talk)16:42, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
