Talk:Bellona's Husband: A Romance/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jack4576 (talk · contribs) 06:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   The prose is clear, concise, and grammatically correct. It seems understandable to a broad audience with enough knowledge about literature and sci-fi themes.

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article does have a lead section that introduces the topic and the layout appears well-organized. The style of writing avoids overly complex phrases and seems to avoid editorializing or making judgments.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   references included

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   sources are reliable

   c. (OR):

   Sample of sources have been checked and verified. Quotes from reviewers are accurate

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

   No Copyvio

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   The article covers the main aspects of the topic. It discusses the novel's synopsis, its reception both during its time of publication and in later years. It provides important details about the plot, the characters, and the themes of the novel.

   b. (focused):

   The article seems to stay focused on the novel itself, avoiding unnecessary details. The synopsis may be a bit extensive, but it seems justified given the unusual elements of the plot.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article represents viewpoints fairly and without apparent bias. It quotes both positive and negative reviews from the time of the novel's publication and incorporates modern critical perspectives. It doesn't appear to favor any specific interpretation over another and lets the reader make their own judgments based on the presented facts.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   no edit wars

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   Given this book is in public domain, the article would be improved by a cover, any accompanying illustrations, or photo of the author. I've added cover myself to bring this to GA

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   as above

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)