Jump to content

Talk:Bellingham Square station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bellingham Square station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article within the week. eviolite (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

  • Sourcing, images good
  • For the lead, add a qualifier like "the newly constructed" before Chelsea station in the last sentence, for clarity
    •  Done
  • Unless I'm missing something, "Washington Street" should be "Washington Avenue" in all mentions (including in history)
    •  Done
  • "The remaining commuter rail platform is located on the north side of the two tracks, with a metal shelter. The station is accessible for Silver Line buses but not commuter rail." - since commuter rail no longer stops at the station I would clarify with something like "disused" (and I don't know if accessibility for the rail platforms are necessary for the same reason)
    •  Done Updated the wording.
  • I'm a bit confused, can't see where on the map it suggests that Route 111 runs on Broadway (it looks to be a different road from 116/117)
    •  Done
  • Link Revere, Massachusetts and main line (railway)
    •  Done
  • Per Wikipedia:Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles#Original research, "in the 1880s or 1890s." should probably be "by the 1890s".
    •  Done
  • Not sure why there's an ellipsis after "Danvers River drawbridge"
    •  Done It was my addition, but I have no idea why. Perhaps a stray kitty paw.
  • There's a mention of "right of way" before the link - should move the link up (and change it to use "right-of-way" for consistency)
    •  Done

@Pi.1415926535: putting on hold. eviolite (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eviolite: Thanks for the review! I've implemented all your recommendations. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Happy to promote now, another fine piece of work. eviolite (talk) 02:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]