Talk:Bellanca Viking

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bellanca 17-30 → Bellanca Viking – While the 17-30 designation is technically correct, and seems to meet the civil-aircraft naming standard from what I can see, "Viking" is the WP:COMMONNAME of the aircraft - I had never heard of a "Bellanca 17-30" until just now, but I was very familiar with the "Bellanca Viking" and Super Viking. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Viking" doesnt actually appear on the type certificate which is why the proper/official Bellanca 17-30 name was originally used. That said I dont have a problem with the marketing name being used per common name. MilborneOne (talk) 20:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bellanca Viking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090224234332/http://home.att.net:80/~vikingdrvr/faq.html to http://home.att.net/~vikingdrvr/faq.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]