Talk:Belize at the 2024 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Passed. charlotte ^👸♥ 04:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 13:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Queen of Hearts (talk · contribs) 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will review this. charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	good charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	good charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	good charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Spotcheck pending... charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] Numbers from this oldid: charlotte ^👸♥ 21:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] 4: Y 7: Y 9: Y 12: Y 15: Y
	2c. it contains no original research.	see 2b
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	see 2b
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	On the short end, but there isn't much to cover and it includes all major aspects. charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	good charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	good charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	good charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are freely licensed and properly tagged. charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	good charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
	7. Overall assessment.	A quite good article; just need to do spotchecks and some minor comments. charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous comments

I think the image of the delegation arriving can be floated right; it doesn't go that far down (or push Gill's image down) even on wide screens. Alternatively use {{stack}} charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is the sentence "The following is the list of number of competitors in the Games." necessary here? I think the presence of the table expresses that pretty well, especially if a caption (see also below comment) is added to the table. charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Consider adding scopes and captions to the tables; see MOS:DTT charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Replace ;Key and ;Track & road events with '''Key''' and '''Track & road events''' per MOS:PSEUDOHEAD charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think any of the key (except the note) is necessary; none of those shorthands are used in the table charlotte ^👸♥ 04:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Queen of Hearts Done with your misc. comments QOH! ^ Arconning (talk) 12:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Arconning: did you forget to hit save? The article hasn't been edited since I opened the review. Happy to pass once this is cleared up. charlotte ^👸♥ 21:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Queen of Hearts Whoops! I believe it's fixed now. Arconning (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.