Talk:Belarusian partisans
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Belarusian partisans page were merged into Belarusian resistance during World War II on 22 June 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Image copyright problem with File:Soviet partisan movement activities overview 1941-1944.jpg
[edit]The image File:Soviet partisan movement activities overview 1941-1944.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't the two articles be integrated?Xx236 (talk) 12:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- I’m agree they are about the same. --Renessaince (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed, but personally I prefer the broader scope of the "resistance" title. This article should be a section of it.—Brigade Piron (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Agree that this article should be a section of Belarusian resistance during World War II. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed, but personally I prefer the broader scope of the "resistance" title. This article should be a section of it.—Brigade Piron (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Both articles rely heavily on the history of Soviet partisans deployed and supplied from Moscow along with the Red Army. The actual historically distinguishable Belarusian anti-Nazi resistance and/or partisans did not play a role in the territory of Soviet Belarus, Belarusian Home Defence did. Both articles could easily be cut in half, because both speak in half-truths. Poeticbent talk 05:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand your point? —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Would you please elaborate on that? What point do you mean? Byelorussian collaboration with the Axis powers was an official policy of the Byelorussian government. Soviet partisans however have their own article in Wikipedia. This article needs to be trimmed because it combines material from Soviet sources to support a subject-specific article which is not their subject. Thanks for asking, Poeticbent talk 21:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- So you are saying that the Bielski partisans, for example, were not Byelorussian? —Brigade Piron (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Would you please elaborate on that? What point do you mean? Byelorussian collaboration with the Axis powers was an official policy of the Byelorussian government. Soviet partisans however have their own article in Wikipedia. This article needs to be trimmed because it combines material from Soviet sources to support a subject-specific article which is not their subject. Thanks for asking, Poeticbent talk 21:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)