Talk:Belapur Fort/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAR.Pyrotec (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

GAR

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This was one of five Indian Forts submitted for WP:GAR on the same day.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Almost the whole of the article is based on a single newspaper article, whose web link is broken.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   A newspaper article does not provide verification of India's history.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   This is a building, an archaeological site and a military structure. Information would be expected on the architecture/style of building, its defences, a floor plan / archaeological plans, etc. They are entirely absent.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This article was submitted simultaneously with a number of other articles, in WP:good faith, for GAR. This article, and apparently others submitted at the same time, suffer from lack of WP:Verify and breath of scope. They can be fixed given time: there are numerous books on this subject, see [1]. However, in view of the number of articles involved, I don't think that this will be achieved in one week. The article can be resubmitted for GAR once these issues have been addressed; and I'm willing to review it, if required, prior to submission to GAR.Pyrotec (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)